From my readings of this week it has become clear that the changing nature of both the student body and available technologies
have required academics to change their approaches to teaching to gain improved
learning outcomes. These technologies
enable instructors, students and others to participate in teaching and learning
at a time and place convenient to them. Technology in learning and teaching
does bring with it a change to the role of the instructor and the nature of
teaching. The transition to online
teaching and learning from a traditional face-to-face approach challenges the
expectations and roles of both instructors and learners. Importantly, today’s OL does not only relate
to replacing or enhancing “old media” with “new media”, it also relates to the
role of institutions itself. Institutions
must have the content and methods that are synchronized for effective OL. This includes setting up of new departments
and policies to fit OL with traditional ways of teaching and learning. Furthermore, the teachers themselves must be
aware of the different designs and messaging techniques that are special to
these technologies. Teachers must be
equipped to deal with the great demand by learners for DE.
To
teach an OL course effectively, it starts with the course material. There are many phases to developing course
material and it is a process that requires many role players. It will never do just to replicate existing
course design and pedagogical practices from a traditional face-to-face teaching
and learning and implement those very practices in an OL environment. So an
effective OL programme starts with the instructional design of the online
course. When moving to an online
learning course from a f-2-f module, then one has to redesign learning towards
a constructivist approach. This often results in a change in: roles and
responsibilities; use of technology; relationships; and online presence. In the design of new learning methodologies to
be effectively taught OL, interaction is a very important aspect of the role of the instructor in distance
education, and one that changes in the online environment. Learning involves
two types of interaction: interaction with content and interaction with other
people. In
developing an online course, participation and interaction must be structured
into the course material. At the end of the day, online learning requires that the
academic changes their beliefs and pedagogical practice.
Tameshnie
Moore & Kearsley, (2012). Chapter 5, "Course Design and
Development," pp. 97-122
Pullen, J.M., & Snow, C. (2007). Integrating synchronous and
asynchronous internet
distributed education for maximum effectiveness. Educ Inf
Technol, (12), 137–148
doi 10.1007/s10639-007-9035-7
Redmond, P (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching:
Pedagogical transitions. Ascilite Hobart: Full Paper.
Retrieved from
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Redmond-full.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment