In Week 3 I started learning more about the “miracles” of Web 2.0
technologies in relation to DE. Learning
about the distinction between epistemologies and theories of learning and how
technologies are affecting pedagogies.
I found that it is necessary here to make a distinction between epistemologies
and theories of learning. An epistemology basically describes the basis on
which we know or believe something to be true.
A theory of teaching or learning will be strongly influenced by one or
more epistemological positions. However, an epistemology does not in itself
address issues of teaching or learning. Learning or teaching theories are
applications of a more general set of epistemological positions or beliefs
about the nature of knowledge. Thus behaviourism is an approach to teaching and
learning reflecting an objectivist epistemology, but then so are some forms of
cognitive psychology or artificial intelligence.For instance, an objectivist, didactic approach—delivering information in a well-structured and organized way—may be necessary to get learners quickly to a position where they can start asking questions or solving problems in a more constructivist manner. Nevertheless the design of teaching will be influenced by the dominant epistemological position of teachers, and this will need to “match,” to some extent, the needs of learners. It is important, then, to ensure that learners are developing the skills and competencies they will need in the “outside world,” which brings the discussion to the teaching and learning needs of a knowledge-based society. In particular, this will provide some guidance on the appropriate choice and use of Web 2.0 tools.
Reference
Bates, T. (2011) Understanding Web 2.0 and its implications for e-learning.
In M.J.W. Lee & C. McLoughlin, Web
2.0-based e-learning: applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp
21-42). Retrieved from www.tonybates.ca/wp-content/uploads/Final-typeset-chapter1.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment